For a long time, you’ve talked about splitting time between illustration and your fine art work. What does each mean to you?
What I wanted to do more than anything was to be a pilot or an astronaut, but I couldn’t do that. Then I had other goals, like any person who does something creative. You’re setting new horizons for yourself.
Once I actually started making a living as an illustrator doing book covers, which was something I thought I’d never really get to, then it was a question of—well, I’ve always wanted to do the John Carter Mars series and boom I got the assignment. These things just kind of came to me.
I started meeting each goal. There began to be fewer and fewer goals in the realm of illustrator that I wanted to accomplish. I became aware after awhile of a growing need to paint the things that I was coming up with on my own, and each succeeding year it got more frustrating to just stick them in the file drawer and put them aside. I kept trying to make time for myself to do the work and it wouldn’t happen.
There began to be fewer and fewer goals in the realm of illustrator that I wanted to accomplish. I became aware after awhile of a growing need to paint the things that I was coming up with on my own…
When I did LUMEN 4, I had the underpainting done in 1992 or something. It sat there in my studio and I saw it virtually every day that I went in to do my illustration work. There’s only so long that you can turn your back to something like that. It is a very compelling vision, it was something I wanted to paint, and every day I had to turn my back to it.
So it was a long process of learning to say no to the comfort of a well established career which provided me all the benefits one could ask for. I was paid well for it and got awards and adulation and everything else. I’d pretty much reached the peak of what I could get to doing fantasy and science fiction book cover illustrations.
That’s what illustration meant to me.
My art, what that means to me…I feel it’s the art of my maturity. People often ask me why I didn’t turn to doing my personal work before and to be honest I don’t think before 1988 I was really ready to.
I think that my skills had to mature to a certain level and I had to undergo certain personality changes and maturation of…thought about how I perceived the outside world and my relationship to it and other things…having two children…all the other things that come with living my life as I’ve lived it.
I feel eminently ready to do that now, but I really think it would have been too early if I’d started in my twenties for example, doing only my work. I think it would have been indistinguishable from my illustration. In fact, it was.
Whenever someone asked me what I do for myself, up until 1987 my answer was always my illustration is the work I do for myself because that’s what I chose to do. Up until ’87 or ’88, that’s all I envisioned myself doing, but something happened. It might have something to do with being a parent…I don’t know.
The ideas started coming to me were not connected to stories. They’re more connected to an alteration of my vision. Joni Mitchell in a recent interview in Vanity Fair said that artists are people who perceive the world in metaphors.
I don’t think that was true of me when I was younger, but there has been a change in me and it’s definitely true of me now. It happens all the time. I catch myself doing it and I can kind of step outside of myself and say isn’t it cool that that’s happening, but there’s another practical side of me that says this is really important and this is something I should use in my art to express the things I was to express.
Joni Mitchell in a recent interview in Vanity Fair said that artists are people who perceive the world in metaphors. I don’t think that was true of me when I was younger, but there has been a change in me and it’s definitely true of me now.
Anyway, those all add up to my perception that my illustration as being something I did when I was younger, and my personal work as something I think is more an expression of my age and maturity now. I don’t mean to suggest in saying this that illustration is only something for kids…is a matter of being immature. I think that the best illustration stands up to the best fine art
It’s just that Illustration is not enough for me any more, unfortunately. I never thought that that would happen.
How many ideas had you filed away at the point where you knew you had to focus on your personal art?
So, a lot of personal subjects came up as alternate concepts for book covers that didn’t get chosen and I would take the concept and either photograph it and keep the slide as a reference for a future, larger painting or I would actually keep the concept or sketch and stick it in the file drawer. I had piles and piles of those after awhile. Well, especially with the anthologies that happened.
I remember the first one that really made a big impact aside from the horror stories ones was 1985 I had been commissioned to do a cover for a book called DISTANT STARS. The publisher said just come up with anything you want based on the title…it’s a collection of short stories by Samuel R. Delaney.
I thought that “distant stars” was really evocative and I came up with all kinds of metaphysical, far out concepts…and Samuel Delaney didn’t like any of them. He wanted something that was a lot more obviously science fiction and they gave me something that I ended up altering and using as the idea for the cover. I had probably eight concepts that I thought all would have made really nice paintings.
One of them had a number of children on a sphinx-like carving. It’s the obvious precursor to SENTINELS. It’s night time and they’re looking out over this vast desert and there’s like a nebula setting in the distance.
It’s in my last book. I’ve had a lot of inquiries about it and people have seen it. So I think it would have struck a chord with people if I had painted it then. I don’t know what it means anyway. It’s just a riff on the title. There’s not a lot of significance to it. That’s the first one I can think of that got me thinking about doing paintings that were totally self-derived.
How hard was it to break away from illustration for you?
It was that and the money. It was very sobering when my last check came from a publisher. It felt very much like I was stepping off a gang plank…going off into free fall, because there was no money coming that I could see.
Money did come from royalties and other sources and things that happened, but at the time I didn’t know how we were going to survive and I kind of give Audrey a lot of credit for having faith in me. I was in free fall for awhile, full of self doubt not sure if I was doing the right thing or not.
I kind of hedged my bets. I took some long term assignments just in case. So that’s why I’m doing a book cover next month. That’s why I did MeatLoaf’s album cover and things like that. I’ve since realized that that was unnecessary.
Did you have any hesitation as to whether you’d be able to bridge over to fine art and be able to do that as a career?
Yeah, I was very unsure and it was only by chance that I found Tree’s Place. I don’t know what would have happened. I’ve been showing my work in some galleries with mixed success and the people who buy my work seem to be fairly ardent and loyal supporters, but you need a certain amount of those to actually make a living at it, so I had no assurance whatsoever that I was going to be able to successfully pull it off.
You’re looking at a different audience for your work. How did that affect you? You obviously seem to pull out some of the same elements…there are some very science fiction elements to your work, particularly the Fading Star series, which have obviously been used for covers. What would you perceive your audience being as far as your fine art?
When I was in my younger years, especially when I was an illustrator, if I heard an artist say that I’d say, “balogna…what a bunch of crap.” But now I’m saying it and I expect other people to say that about me but it’s really true.
The reason I don’t quite like SENTINELS as much as some of my other paintings is that there are elements in there—things about that painting that look the way it does because I couldn’t quite let go of considering my audience.
I remember when I was painting AVATAR, there was part of my mind trying to convince myself to put in a figure because people expect there to be a figure in my paintings…and I like painting figures, but the original concept of the paintings which I had in the float tank there were no figure in that.
When I painted AVATAR and THE RED STEP, [I said] I’m just going to be true to the initial concept and paint it as I see it. In both cases, I got such positive response to the paintings that it really surprised me. I honestly didn’t think anybody would like either of them, especially RED STEP.
It took Audrey a lot of time to convince me to even take it to a show because it was so drab in color it seemed to me when actually it’s won ribbons. It really caught me by surprise. It was a great affirmation.
It was so different and so cutting edge for you.
I remember when David Bowie did the Low album. I don’t know if you’re familiar with his career or not. He went to Germany and just to satisfy his contract he had to do an album. He chucked everything in his pop career and did this electronic album. Half of it is depressing German Euro-synth music.
It was an incredible breakthrough album. It influenced many many musicians. It was a huge influence on me. It caught me totally by surprise when people came back to me and told me they thought it was great.
The same thing happened to me with my personal work. Every time I take that attitude when I do a painting, I say lets see what they think of this. I had this dream and it sure is a wacky concept and it’s such a weird composition, but I’ll go ahead and do it anyway and see what happens.
Every time I do that, I get nothing but a positive response, so I’ve had nothing but encouragement. So I guess I’ll keep on going like that and hopefully it’ll reinforce in me confidence in my own vision. I won’t dilute it with considerations of who my audience is.
The show at Tree’s Place was the first major exhibition of your personal work, where you’re showing it all in a collection to an actual audience. In terms of your career goals, how important was that for you?
If I didn’t sell a single piece in the show and felt that people didn’t do the work, I really think I would still paint it because it’s really important to me. And how I feel when I’m doing the painting is half the reason why I’m doing it.
Now that the show seemed to be a great success—you sold a lot of paintings before the show even opened—where does that take you now?
I feel that some massive doors have been opened up for me. I’ve had a lot of ideas lingering on the edge that are a little bit more extreme than the things I’ve done up till now, and it really makes me want to kick open the doors to those things and go ahead and do them now and just keeping reaching outwards. It’s such a wonderful sense of affirmation I have. I feel really gratified that people like my work.
Someone managing my career would say that I should never admit that I’m surprised when people are buying the work, but I am because a painting like SUBTERRANEANS is for me so intensely personal, so much so that when people ask me for a detailed explanation about it sometimes it’s hard for me to articulate exactly. To know that I’m at least communicating the subjective undercurrent that’s a great feeling. It feels like I’m succeeding in something.
To me that’s the measure of success of the painting is whether or not people are getting the base things that I’m trying to communicate, which is the subjective content, the emotion. If they get anything else on top of that that’s fine. That’s gravy as Arthur C. Clarke said.
Even now if someone sees THE RED STEP and stares at it and seems to enjoy it, the main emotion I feel is wonderment that it’s working for them too. I certainly had no one else in mind when I painted the painting.
Now that you’ve actually taken some time off and done a considerable amount of work on your fine art, do you have a picture of the grander vision of the work? It seems to fall in different series obviously.
I realize that my personal mythologies and symbols are falling into groupings that I’ve given titles to, but I have no intention of setting a limit or an endpoint to any of these. I think I’ve got to let my life direct and alter and evolve with these. I have to let a series evolve with my life and my outlook as time goes on rather than set some sort of artificial endpoint or final statement.
I’m as surprised as the next person half the time when some of these ideas come to me and tell me that they need to be painted, especially the ones that come in my dreams. I don’t know where they come from, but they feel important and they feel like…when the concept comes to me I feel that it has to be me that paints it. There is a sense of that.
Most of the time, I know what the painting is about before I do them, but I can’t say that I consciously have an idea where they come from. Yeah, I’ve got generalized ideas of sizes and shapes and some elements in the immediate future. I know that in the next six months I want to do more paintings with figures in them. I want to do more large ones and more small ones. I want to do some round paintings and work with some other shapes that I haven’t worked with.
The beginning of your fine art came with the Passage series, which means a lot of different things. You talk about it most obviously as being a bridge between mediums or going from acrylics which you favor to oils which you’re becoming more familiar with.
I keep falling back into needing to use airbrush when I paint in acrylics. When I paint works smaller, I don’t feel like I need it to create a blend. The larger the blend has to be, the harder it is to do it all by hand. I so dislike using an airbrush. I really want to get used to doing more of my work in oils so I can avoid using an airbrush.
CAUSEWAY was in oils, but CAUSEWAY almost was a total disaster because of the problems I had with the varnish on it. My oil painting career is somewhat checkered, but that’ll change. I just have to use it more often.
I’m just so familiar with acrylics. I’ve been using them day in and day out virtually for 20 odd…22 years, so it’s like second nature to me.
What are the differences between the mediums for you?
You don’t have all the problems you do with oils…with having to let a painting dry for 6 months before you put the final picture varnish on it. If you want to get work done quickly and proceed on the next project, it seems like acrylics are really made for that. You get less dust in the paints. All of my oil paintings act like dust magnets. I find that really annoying.
The thing about oils is the smell of turpentine when you walk into the studio. For me, it is an indescribable sensory experience. When I walk into my studio and if I smell oil paints or turpentine, there is a romance to it that I guess harkens back to my teenage years when I first became acquainted with oils and I took some figure painting classes.
When I think of painting and being an artist, I think of oil paints, but when I have a dream I want to realize quickly and see really quickly, I go to acrylics because I want to get done and see it quickly if I can. I have a love of both mediums. They just have a different feeling.
When I think of painting and being an artist, I think of oil paints, but when I have a dream I want to realize quickly and see really quickly, I go to acrylics because I want to get done and see it quickly if I can.
If I’m working quickly in oils, they tend to show brushwork a lot more and become a lot more expressive. You wouldn’t know it but some of the paintings I’ve done like CAUSEWAY, which is tightly controlled. When I painted CAUSEWAY, I had a sense of trying to retain a sense of control over the medium so that it felt like my acrylic paintings. Does that make sense?
If you look at some of my oil painting sketches, they’re a lot freer and Frazetta-ish. I hate to use that term, but everyone knows what I mean when I say that. I’ve been accused of letting him influence me, but that’s just the way I paint when I’m painting in oils and I’m painting quickly. I’m not satisfied with leaving it that way, actually. I usually tighten things up, because I want a more complete vision for the paintings.
I feel good when I sit down and paint in oils. I feel good when I’m painting in acrylics. It’s just like two different friends with two different personalities. Sometimes one feels right with one subject, and sometimes one feels right with another subject.
Talking about Passages, other than the literal meaning between mediums, what other kinds of Passages?
I was conscious of that when I painted Alexa on that thing. It wasn’t her stepping off. It was me too. That was one passage.
The core theme really was a spiritual one and that being the transition from life to death. I got involved in thinking a lot about and questioning my concepts or lack of concepts about the whole issue of spirituality and life after death—thinking of my religious background and my rejection of it. The paintings have a lot to do with that.
AVATAR is about on one level getting past the structure of dogma in organized religion. That’s what the crumbling arches are about. I’ve never explained it before, but that’s what I was thinking when I decided to make them. The avatar is a star on the horizon calling the spheres of consciousness.
I always thought if such a thing exists…I just thought the idea of an avatar and of life after death is a beautiful idea even if it’s not reality. We won’t know until we die. I think the idea is beautiful enough for a painting to be done about it. Even if at some point I decide I’m a total atheist or not, I don’t see myself ever rejecting the painting because I think the painting is worthy of exploration.
I was raised a Catholic. I’ve had a number of things happen in my life that make me conscious that there’s a lot more to reality than what can be scientifically proven. So when scientists tell me that it’s this way or that way, I have a sense of cynical doubt about the firmness of their affirmation. I question that. I know my feelings suggest to me that there might be something to metaphysics, but I’m not sure anybody really has a handle on it.
That’s interesting because for awhile you considered going into medicine—into a scientific profession. Is that part of the reason for your change? Is that logically in line that you had doubts at that point?
You said that you don’t necessarily believe science is…
There are some things that happen in life like experiencing a clairvoyant moment or seeing a UFO that if it happens to you and you’ve experienced it, then you can answer for yourself whether there is something that you believe in or not. It’s never possible to totally convince somebody else who didn’t experience it…one way or the other.
I know there is such thing as clairvoyance because I’ve had situations happen to me that have proven its existence to me and it’s unexplainable by our current state of science.
I would love to see a flying saucer and know for sure whether they’re real or not. I don’t want to die, but I’d really like to see that question answered for me. But I know there is such thing as clairvoyance because I’ve had situations happen to me that have proven its existence to me and it’s unexplainable by our current state of science.
If that thing can be real, something that can not be measured effectively yet by any known form of science…can’t be proven or disproven through scientific means…if such a thing as that exists, it opens the door to believing that maybe well maybe perhaps some other things exist like the possibility of existing after death. There being an inextinguishable spirit within people that survives death and goes to some other state.
I think it’s a beautiful idea and it’s certainly an alluring one because none of us wants to face up to our own mortality and believe it’s just the end. I’ve felt this way for quite a while, but I’ve never felt a need to express it artistically, but I do now.
You said that you’ve experienced moments of clairvoyance?
What type of an experience is that? Can you describe it?
I’d say during my entire senior year in high school, I knew whenever a pop test would happen the next day or not. I remember at least on two occasions studying for a test the night before and just knowing that the test wasn’t going to happen, even though we’d known from the beginning of the school year that there was going to be a test on a certain day. I’d close my book and go watch TV or read a comic and the next day I’d go to class and the teacher was sick that day and didn’t show up.
What’s amazing to me in retrospect is that I didn’t think it was anything special. I just kind of accepted it and never remarked on it to anybody, until I had a dream once.
When I had dreams that happened, they always had a special clarity to them. Two things happened. There was a special clarity to them and I always woke up in the middle of the night when I had the dream and had to go back to sleep again.
And I had one dream I remember about the sequence of events that was going to happen the next day. I remember it really clearly like I had the dream last night. The next morning I remember mumbling to my sister over breakfast that I had this dream and in the dream I was in the school play and I went to the stage to rehearse and the teacher was there with a couple students standing next to her. She looked up from her clipboard and said, “What are you doing here? Didn’t you hear we cancelled rehearsal tonight?”
I go like this [slaps head] and I turned around and opened the door and run after my girlfriend, who I had said goodbye to. She was heading back home. Usually I walked her home everyday after school. And then half way to running to where I usually met her, I realized “oh yeah…that’s right. She got a ride home.” How I knew that I don’t know. She had a ride home from somebody so I’ll just go home and call her up at home.
Anyway, I told my sister this and she probably doesn’t remember it now. Anyway, that happened.
I personally have a deep and abiding conviction that there is more to intellect than what can be determined through scientific tests, at least at our present state of knowledge.
After school, I went to the rehearsal and the teacher was there. The reason I hit myself in the head is I said I dreamed all this. I knew it was going to happen. I ran to the spot and I knew that my girlfriend had a ride home. I got home and called her up and her best friend had given her a ride home because she’d driven her car to school that day. It all happened. So I knew that I’d dreamt it—that I didn’t make it up during that day somehow because I’d told my sister about it that morning.
Anyway, I had things like but gradually during my college years, especially during my freshman year it started to wain and went away by the time I was halfway through college.
I personally have a deep and abiding conviction that there is more to intellect than what can be determined through scientific tests, at least at our present state of knowledge. We have to remember that things such as radioactivity and magnetic fields were totally unknown to us until the ability came for us to detect them later. It’s quite possible at some point in the future that we’ll be able to measure and quantify these phenomenon, but right now we can’t so a lot of people persist in denying that they exist.
Sometimes it comes back to me. We were coming home from something…Audrey and I…and I started slowing down. She said, “What’s the matter?” and I said, “I just think we’d better slow down. There may be a deer in the road or something.” We turned the corner and there were three deer on our street right here. So it happens once in awhile. It could be coincidence. But later on in my college years, I met a man who was truly clairvoyant. So far beyond the realm of coincidence that it was ridiculous.